Dear President and
Minister,
I write to you as an advocate for quality education
and as someone who agrees with your laudable motives for improving education in
the country, especially basic and secondary levels. Your changes are occurring
in difficult times. If Charles Dickens were here, he would definitely call our
days Hard Times, because now most
teachers see money, not human
potential. Many are clueless that the products they fail to nurture pose the
biggest threat to society. Amidst such chaos, your Government has taken the
courageous stand to fund secondary education, increase access to education, rid
the system of exploitative practices.
Parents, guardians, all pragmatic Ghanaians appreciate
the services being provided for free:
“Admission, feeding and boarding, tuition, textbooks, library, science resource
centre, computer laboratory, examination, one meal for day students. Fact: This country has enough for everyone’s
needs; it does not have enough for everybody’s greed or extravagance. With
frugal use of tax payers’ money, the policy can not only be sustained amidst any
challenges, but it can also be improved.
Dear President, I share your sentiment wholly that
America’s decision to completely fund secondary education a century ago has
brought the nation to its current destination of a beacon of educational
excellence and quality lifestyle. Additionally, when the Russians pioneered
space exploration, President Kennedy acknowledged that America was operating a
moribund school curriculum and rapidly worked out a dynamic science curriculum
that responded to changing times. Even so, a century ago, America did not have
the benefit of Information Technology (IT). Currently, that is an ace up
Ghana’s sleeve. The hassles that characterised admission in 2017 need not be repeated.
IT could smoothen the processes, come September 2018.
In computerised learning systems, one can conveniently
access information and services online. In Ghana, however, when examination
results are released by the West African Examinations Council (WAEC), it means
parents/guardians must buy a scratch card for a code with which to access and
download results from WAEC website. That should have changed in 2017, Sirs. But
it did not; therefore, the GES ought to improve its computer system in order to
remove the bottlenecks for parents and guardians. Utilize the Internet.
Effective this September, immediately WAEC announces its
results, parents and candidates should be able to access examination results from its website or a telephone hotline, using
candidate’s numbers, from the comfort of
their homes. Within the first week, WAEC should offload the entire results onto
the GES database for immediate activation and dissemination. By the second
week, parents and candidates should be accessing the admission lists from the
website.
The essence of computerization ought to be the
convenience of online access of information and expedited services. That has
not been the culture of GES computerisation system. In 2016, following the announcement
of release, parents thronged school campuses, some travelling two or three
regions, only to be told that the GES could not abide by its schedule, so they
had to wait a day or two. Those who primed themselves for return trips found
themselves in a fix. Even though the scenario was different in 2017, it could
be further improved upon. There has been a precedent.
In the era of Common Entrance Examination, WAEC
simultaneously posted master results to centres in each region and lists of
students to their respective choices, names of unsuccessful candidates excluded.
Candidates who passed could tell from their marks whether they would be
admitted by their first or second choice. Schools readily prepared and mailed
admission letters and prospectuses to candidates and parents. The examinations
were written in March/April; by July ending, the outcomes had reached candidates
and parents. That was the manual age. Contrarily, this is the electronic age, so
numbers notwithstanding, accessing WASSCE results should be expedited.
Only a dynamic IT system could smoothen high school admission
processes. The GES website must have a link for admission, so that candidates
can ascertain which of their four choices they have secured. The same site must
have a link for prospectus which would be accessed and downloaded by parents. Not
only would the link save parents multiple trips to the schools, but it would render
the processes transparent. Such transparency would pre-empt the situation where
schools can add superfluous items that compel parents to pay money they should
not, thereby, negating Government’s efforts to provide free secondary
education. Since PTA levy is mandatory, MoE/GES could ensure that the schools
do not utilise that to replicate illegitimate payments.
Educational institutions elsewhere which handle larger
numbers than our BECE and SHS candidates manage their examination systems
electronically, so Ghana can do same. But it will not be done through the
communication service providers. We have seen the chaos they can cause. The
Ministry should explore the technical skills of the electronic team that
collated and released accurate election results locally and internationally
within a few hours of closing elections in December 2016. That team should
electronically sanitize MoE/GES computer system and service delivery by giving
it a high capacity, as well as a most accessible path in order to close avenues
for exploitation during admission. Without a super IT intervention, Sirs, unscrupulous
elements will continuously explore innovative means to financially exploit
parents/guardians.
The average intrepid Ghanaian parent cannot be relied
upon to protest any such exploitation, because they are terrified of
retaliatory measures by school figures. Parents will overcompensate by
kowtowing to rather than exposing unprofessional or unethical practices by any
of the school authorities. These very parents also constitute the electorate,
President and Minister, so they will acquiesce and later complain that the
Government has failed to provide free
secondary education. Thus, sterilising the system electronically will be a
win-win situation for all stakeholders. However, once admission is completed,
learning occurs. Quality content deserves its own platform. I address that in
my next letter, Sirs.
No comments:
Post a Comment