“Why is
everyone talking about this lady?” My youthful in-law is awed by the huge
impact of the death of Queen Elizabeth II in global news. I explained to her that
the Queen had been hugely historical, coming from a stock that once controlled
a quarter of the globe through imperial, colonial power, reduced to fourteen
countries currently under her headship. The fascination increased as I
explained the Queen’s oversight of the Commonwealth, through which the current independent
states continuously receive diverse benefits from the former colonizer.
A mother and
beneficiary of the Free Maternal Aid from Britain, the youngster quickly
grasped my explanation that after gaining independence, the Queen’s country has
continued to support Ghana in Grants and Aid. Indeed, the Commonwealth has
heavily supported education among Ghanaians who study overseas. It supports not
only learners, but the nucleus family as well, many of which beneficiaries
refuse to return to the country to help, thereby, defeating the purpose of the
Commonwealth Scholarship.
The
conversation also reminded me of a question that has nestled in my heart
throughout my growing years and postcolonial studies. How did the Queen feel
about those former colonies that fervently wrenched their independence from
Britain but have not really managed their resources for economic autonomy, as
they so boisterously claimed in pre-independence days? The uncertainty
describing the period after independence as (post)colonial or postcolonial
highlights the blur regarding the pastness of the past, in academia as in
geo-politics.
A more crucial
question is how the former colonized have utilized their independence to
further human interests. Most of African independence fighters promptly became
local colonizers as soon as the foreign colonizer left. Contemporary Ghanaian
society is smirched with layered forms of degradation in human rights. In many
domestic spaces, young girls labelled “maid servants” are treated in
dehumanizing ways. Rapacious Parents molest their children, even sell them into
child labour. State structures established and paid to protect and improve human
rights are nauseously intrepid, hence, focus strays from human to wealth.
Betrayal from a foreigner does not cut as deep as betrayal from one’s own.
Therefore,
in mourning the Queen of England, we also ponder on our responsibility and/or
complicity in (mis)handling natural, infrastructural and human resources. Objective
analyses of management of resource in pre-colonial, colonial and (post)colonial
days would constitute effective guide. We should also seriously contemplate our
failure in making education work to maximum benefits, the growing superficiality
in fixating on certification instead of nurturing knowledge and skills which
enable effective utilization of resources for genuine independence.
Honouring
the Ruler
The
globality of the mourning is itself a history, violent past, nations within the
commonwealth fighting to localize state headship, notwithstanding. Indeed,
through her quiet but gritty leadership, Queen Elizabeth II symbolized
stability through tumultuous changing times. Respectfully, Ghana, India, others
are flying their flags half-mast for a week. One national reported that Hong
Kong has not mourned any of its past leaders in the heightened manner they are
mourning the Queen.
Even in Belfast where the struggle to leave the UK is quite fierce, the statesman who proclaimed the Kinship of H.M Charles III eulogized the late Queen as “a lady who has contributed so much to the country, to the world, to the Commonwealth!” One state figure described her as “one of the threads that binds UK together”. A BBC reporter aptly summed public emotions as the Queens’s remains moved from Balmoral to Edinburg: “… a final display of devotion to the Queen”. Strolling in the Green Park was themed gratitude: “… the slow quiet walk through the park, the mood sombre and thankful”. Laying flowers, queuing on the street for a glimpse of King Charles III or Queen’s cortege emanated from the urge to “do something or go somewhere as a way of paying their respects”. Across the globe, people share “wonderful memories of a wonderful lady” and “… thank the Queen for her wonderful service”. My mother, belonging to the pre-independence generation, simply refers to her as "our original Queen". The do not knows should read for a glimpse of the complex colonial history that continuously shapes our present to avoid replication colonial patterns.
Dignifying
the Dead
Queen
Elizabeth II, a model of style and fashion decency, sitting posture and social
interaction is also exemplifying socio-cultural decorum in death. She authored her
funeral arrangement. The small cortege has impressed my in-law, compared with
the large ones she often witnesses in Ghana.
“Sometimes,
history unfolds quietly”, was how a reporter conceptualized the quiet weepy “river
of people” from Balmoral through Aberdeen to Edinburg through to Buckingham
Palace to Westminster. Similar
respectful silence greeted the pronouncement of the death of one Royal Majesty
and the installation of another Royal Majesty in Welsh and Belfast. To the
effective communicator, the respectful hallmarks the public’s genuine honour for
the Queen.
Funerals
have become a major source of noise pollution and violent invasion of privacy in
Ghana. Music blares from dawn to dust for burial and continues the following
day, noise and revelry detracting heavily from solemn occasions. Valuable
lessons of sombreness from the royal funeral.
The Queen
understood and knew how to change with turbulent times. Her astuteness endowed
her with grit and objectivity in duty. I join millions in paying respect to Her
Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, a dynamic leader of the times.
No comments:
Post a Comment